The UN and its Security Council: Time for change

Over six months ago, I wrote on this blog that I am yet to understand why most supposed media experts, communicators, political scientists and diplomats turn to misuse the appellation international community. I said so because most often, the supposed powerful countries team up with their allies and want to call those who defy them as, defiling the international community and unfortunately, this is always largely relayed by the media and the so-called global media.

Nevertheless, when one enters into the politics of media and editorial policies, then one may understand why some media prefer the line they chose to take.

The United Nations General Assembly, which has almost 200 members, is the only body whose decision warrants the appellation “international community” and such a decision can only be that of the majority.

It therefore beats one’s imagination and that of several other critics why some countries grouped under what is referred to as the Security Council with veto powers, claim to take decisions and want to impose them on the real international community.

On the contrary, members of the same body have violated the so-called international community and aggressed others with devastating consequences we have now. Radicalism, terror, fear, hatred, hunger, strife for the aggressed, contrasting to booming economic activities for the aggressors. These are the characteristics of the work of the permanent members of the Security Council and their allies.

The speech of the Libya leader Muammar Gaddafi during the 64 General Assembly of the UN held in New York in September 2009 and calling for the radical modification of the UN Security Council among other praiseworthy demands is worth taking seriously. Praising such a speech and calling for a real revolution does not mean one condones his overstay in power or support radical religious beliefs because mixing the two while commenting on the speech of Gaddafi may lead us to a wrong direction or conclusion.

SECURITY COUNCIL AGAINST DEVELOPMENT and PEACE

The promotion of peace, democracy, human rights and freedom and the granting of so-called veto rights to some countries grouped under what is called permanent members of the UN Security council is in itself disturbing.

Members of this group have used their power either to block sanctions on some states and this has had serious repercussions on human rights, democracy and freedom. Others have used it to impose sanctions on non-ally states and this has similar consequences.

We cannot therefore compare development, democracy, human rights to veto power because they are at parallels. While nations support development in their states and ally-states, they use veto powers to block the take off of other nations.

Some may want to argue that the members of the Security Council are among the wealthiest and bear a heavy financial burden on the UN, but again ask yourself who are the highest debtors of the UN and those benefiting from the bureaucracies and the white-collar administrative positions of the same institutions.

As far as democracy is concerned, veto power is a nonstarter.

To enhance world peace and development, I think the veto power and/or permanent member stuff of the UN should be scrapped and no nation and its ally or allies should claim to speak for the international community when they do not represent it.

AFRICA MUST WAKE UP

Unfortunately, most African leaders are a bunch of cowards working in dispersed ranks and each ruler following the commands of the seen and unseen neo-colonial countries. That is why some maintain a rather useless quiet diplomacy and most meet their colonial and imperialist mentor off camera and often dance according to the tune of these mentors.

African countries must stand as a strong force against all such of oppression and work together like the European Union for better development of the continent. Inasmuch African leaders would only be interested in stashing wealth in foreign banks and countries, the continent cannot take off and it will take a serious revolution to root off these bunches of failures.

The worst thing that ever happened to humankind in my opinion was not even the holocaust, but the colonisation and notably, of the African continent. I am not in any way undermining the holocaust but the abuses and massacres caused directly and indirectly because of the colonisation are terrible. Despite the hundreds of millions killed during slave trade and colonial era, millions continue to die under neo-colonial regimes in the continent.

This is not blame game but just identifying where the real problem is. Inasmuch as we drive to improve very section of the continent be it in the technological, scientific, agricultural, economic, social and political spheres, the fight against neo-colonialism in all its form must be ruthless.

The audacity of hope is believing in yourself, in positive change, and challenging the current status quo. Attaining our dreams is using our position be it as president or, a street sweeper diligently and considering it as a mean to an end. My dream is not becoming president. It is having an influence in the life of people in what I do, write or say.

CAMEROON: Like the ruling and opposition parties: Why participation in the 2011 presidential election may be poor

Cameroon has over 200 political parties, with more than three-quarter just satellite parties causing confusion and ensuring current political continuity. Since 1985, Cameroon People Democratic Movement CPDM a transformation of the Cameroon Nation Union has been in power.

Current party Chairman Paul Biya has been the unchallenged ruling party candidate. Note should be taken that he came to power in 1982, through appointment, under the canopy of the CNU.

According to the constitution of Cameroon and following the electoral calendar, the next presidential elections are expected in 2011. Some ruling party elite who claim to be speaking for the masses are calling on president Biya to stand and inundating the press with motions of support.

For twenty-seven years that Biya and the CPDM have ruled Cameroon, various institutions of the country have gone weaker and corruption, embezzlement, impunity and total decadence prevailed. The president spends more time out of the country, squandering taxpayers’ money than visiting various towns in Cameroon and listening to his compatriots.

Few roads, hospitals, professional colleges etc have been constructed. The few jobs done so far, terribly contrast to the works of President Amadou Ahidjo.

Several companies have closed and unemployment has skyrocketed yet, the government has increased consumption (running), rather than investment budget.

Supporters or fans of Biya have always argued that he has maintained peace and stability forgetting that it has been the work of Cameroonians who are naturally peace loving.

It goes beyond maintaining only “peace” for successful governments, which should also sort for economic development, social justice, fight against corruption etc.

What explains Paul Biya's long rule

It is certain that president long rule is largely because of the overwhelmingly sophisticated fraudulent election machinery put in place by government.

Nevertheless, Cameroon has a plethoric number of opposition parties with no clear agenda. Many preach virtues and practise vices. They hardly talk of their plans for the education, health, social and other sectors other than criticising the current government’s incompetence.

The opposition has failed to reap the fruits of Biya’s ineffectiveness and inefficiency. They have been thinking Biya’s evil deeds would make Cameroonians just vote for them. No, it does not work that way. Inasmuch as there is corruption, clinking to power by promoted by the elites in the ruling party, the same thing is happening in the opposition parties.

President Biya has led his party and ruled Cameroon for 24 and 27 years respectively, that is since the transformation to the current CPDM. The SDF was created in 1990 and since then John Fru Ndi has been the unchallenged party chairman sidelining all rivals or out rightly sacking them from the party. This is same with the Ndam Njoya of CDU, Bello Bouba Maigari of the NUDP, and Augustin Frederick Kodock of the Kodock faction of the UPC.

In April 2008, the ruling CPDM parliament changed the constitution giving Biya more powers and the possibility to run as many times as he can. The SDF, which cried foul, has equally changed its constitution giving extra powers to the chairman.

The SDF chairman in a press outing castigated those on Biya’s payroll but trying to distort his party, yet, he accepted Biya’s financial “aide”.

While constantly castigating France and its neo colonial institutions in Cameroon, Fru Ndi rents his apartment to the largest French gambling company in Africa, PMUC. He has to learn that in assuming certainly positions one has to make sacrifices.

Why participation for 2011 may be very poor

When one therefore looks at the opposition in Cameroon, it is just has bad as the ruling party. Just as the ruling party leader appoints people from his region to key government posts, so to are the opposing parties’ leaders getting their people to lead various sections or organs in their camp.

In view of this stalemate, many Cameroonians have lost hope not necessarily in the opposition per ser but in the current leaders. It is for this reason that inasmuch as the Fru Ndi, Paul Biya, Ndam Njoya, Belo Bouba etc would continue to lead their parties and represent them in elections; most Cameroonians would stay home and refuse to vote.

These various parties have others capable of taking the mantle of leadership and proposing something better to Cameroonian rather than inertia.

During the 2007 council and legislative elections just a little over 3 million of the 12 million potential voters registered and less than 60 percent of the registered voters casted their votes.

With this growing resignation and frustration, the ruling party is always able to mobilise idle youths with a few bottles of beer or bank notes and register them several times or pay them to vote for their party

.

Added on to this as earlier said, the complex rigging machinery put in place by government and supported by successive electoral bodies such as National elections Observatory, NEO II and I and now, seemingly ELECM have made many to lose hope.

Solution

Cameroonians should massively register on voters’ registers. They should protest if their votes are rigged and leaders of the opposition, civil societies, religious bodies etc MUST lead the protests. It must not be an issue of sitting at home and asking militants to go to the streets.

That is how change may come to Cameroon because Biya has the neo-colonial backing of the so called internationl community, to validate his fraud and turn around to give us lessons on democracy and corruption.

True change can only come from Cameroonians and led by patriotic leaders who should be ready to fully assume their responsibilities. If this is not the case, most ministers, DOs, governors, delegates, GMs may have to collapse and die simultaneously for the change to come. But since that is certainly not the best wish for them, the civil society, religious leaders, opposition leaders and the Diaspora have a great role to play.