Wednesday, December 31, 2008

MY “WISH”, our CHALLENGES for 2009 and beyond

MY “WISH”, our CHALLENGES for 2009 and beyond.

Some people call it a wish but, I prefer to talk of a challenge. It is a challenge for me to accelerate in 2009, my contribution to human enlightenment, consciousness and knowledge as well as to keep on learning from others.

The greatest problem plaguing the world today is neo colonialism, imperialism by a privileged few, who are so determined to dominate the world in all aspects and make others eternal “slaves”. This has been manifested through horrible exploitation, sponsoring of conflict, terror and horror, and bullying of others especially the “weak”. Were others born to play the second fidlle? I do not think so. We must struggle to position ourselves and not only rely on circumstances but create those circumstances and opportunities.

In a chat with a friend in Belgium, he told me that the world is already too complicated and we just have to dance the dance as it is without challenging or questioning the status quo. I told him if the present status quo was made by man within a very long period of time, it can also be changed by man not necessarily the people who made it, though, also within an even longer time frame.

As a development, international journalist and communicator, I will not only report events as they are. I must go beyond the mere reporting, to give some details that I know, of what might have triggered an event. It is not enough to report that people have been killed or are being exploited. Why and how are they being killed and what can be done to stop such exploitation and massacres? We must only write that in books but talk of it everyday to create the needed awareness.

In a collective way, we can alter the injustice implanted hundreds of years ago. If we believe in it and above all believe in ourselves, we can start now and in another one thousand years to come or so to come, we should have made a better place for many to live in , just as others prepared it for the few enjoying now.

It does not suffice to believe in change, we must believe in ourselves to effect the change needed". (Agendia Aloysius)

Journalist, development communicator.

Media and the use/misuse of the appellation “International Community”

Media and the use/misuse of the appellation “International Community”

Various media organs around the world operating from their own agenda have always been using the phrase “international community” to accept or negate certain issues and events. It is in most cases made without attributions therefore coming as sweeping statements which may just be reflecting the views of the journalist or the media organ.

It is common to hear, “the International community has condemned US over the aggression in Iraq, the International Community has blamed Hamas for the violence in the Middle east, The international community has condemned the Coup in this or that country , The international community has called on Israel to shun horror and terror in their disproportionate response to the filing of rocket propel grenades by Palestinian militants, the international community has blamed President Laurent Gbagbo and his government for the prolonged conflict in that country, the International community has blamed President Mugabe for the humanitarian crisis in his country. The international community has done this; the international community has done that” etc.

As someone developing a career in international communication, global journalism and international development, I have always asked myself, who is this international community, how are they qualified and quantified and who do they represent?

There are almost two hundred countries in the world. The United Nations which can be described as the largest grouping of countries in the world has 192 members. Some say it does not bring about any unanimity. Others claim that the UN is in itself, undemocratic, therefore, cannot claim to speak for the international community when some members exclusively hold veto power to stifle the development of “rebel” states and leaders.

In my opinion, the media should not only inform, educate, entertained but contribute to development. That is why going beyond reporting, to presenting issues and analysing making fair comments and opening up for discussion is very good. Media must not shy away from its development role, yet indirectly or directly represent the views of their political masters, most of who profess imperialism, domination, oppression etc.

According to Finnish Professor of Communication and Development, Kaarle Nordenstreng, "only the UN General assembly can be said to speak on behalf of the international". He posits that the security council cannot, given that it is not representative enough.

When colonial troops were placed in the middle of Cote D’ Ivoire separating the North and the South of that country in a bid to comfortably arm rebels who had been favoured in a trouble making MACOUSSI peace deal, most radio organs be they the so called global media blamed and keep blaming the Ivorian government saying for example, “the international community has held President Gbagbo for stalling the peace talks”. Who was therefore this international community? Was it France and its allies? The same applies to several countries and situations.

I am therefore really flabbergasted when I hear supposedly “more experienced” and “pace-setting” media organs referring to some countries and their allies as “the international community”. I think the international community should be a mutually inclusive than exclusive thing.

It appears the media seem to have fallen prey to some politicians who are happy with such appellations because in my opinion, I have never read any article quantifying this “international community” by; some, many or most. It is often categorical. In very few cases, the use of the appellation may have been appropriate. This also applies to other appellations as militants. Who is a militant, who is a freedom fighter?

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

ENS Maroua: Mediocrity versus meritocracy in Cameroon

ENS Maroua: Mediocrity versus meritocracy in Cameroon

While in Cameroon, I was overwhelmed when I heard about the creation of the Advanced Teacher Training College in Maroua. I knew it would create jobs and also happy that it would spur the people of the grand north to be more interested in education.

I was again happy to read the result on the website of the French daily Le Jour. But, I was taken aback, when recently, I checked daily news online, and read that Members of Parliament, for the Grand Nord provinces, were not satisfied with the quota ; 33 percent according to Jacque Fame Ndongo, Higher Education Minister, and 14 percent according to them, accorded to the grand north.

These MPs, according to online reports, then threatened with a strike and called on the Head of State, Paul Biya to cancel the results or admit a considerable number of candidates for the grand north under what is usually called sociological composition of admitted candidates into professional schools in Cameroon.

To my astonishment, President Paul Biya, whom one of his minister recently said that he does not work under pressure, bowed to the pressure from the MPs and not only granted their wish, but, far beyond that, accorded more than the number of places they wanted, thereby giving them a percentage of 60 among the those enrolled this year in various fields.

This leaves many of us really worried. When will mediocrity give room for meritocracy in Cameroon? Is our president a coward? When did the head of state start appointing those who will get into professional schools? Was Biya doing that for the interest of Cameroon or the interest of the Grand North or even his political interest? Has he ever asked himself about the sociological composition in the appointment of says General Managers, Governors, Ministers, and other top level government posts he makes?

Has he, who is preaching rigour and moralisation, forgotten that the said school is expected to train teachers who will thereafter train youths, Cameroon’s future? Has he forgotten that the admission of mediocre students will have a multiplier effect on the number of mediocre Cameroonians in multiple sectors?

In 2006, Anglo-Saxon students in the University of Buea protested against the admission of students to the medical school in that institution who did not even sit in for the written part of the examination. Yaoundé authorities asked soldiers to opened fire on unarmed students, killing two and wounding several others in 2006. Did Biya ask himself thereafter about the sociological composition of those admitted in the school as well as similar school created in the University of Douala? What future is Mr Biya and his accomplices building for Cameroon?

It really puzzles me that in virtually all professional schools in Cameroon, mediocrity and ignominy are now the benchmarks. Half baked nurses in the name of doctors are trained in CUSS and these guys end up taking a lot of souls consciously or unconsciously. The problem may not be even with the training as such, but, with the calibre of students admitted there.Most of those admitted are not qualified. Just as in other professional schools in Cameroon, ENAM, EMIA, POLICE, and ASMA/ESSTIC etc.

I have always said that if Biya were to rigorously fight corruption, let him give room for meritocracy. This is because, if people were to get into the public service by merit, the degree at which they take or give bribe in the course of their duties may be minimised to the highest level. The public service will then be filled with hard working and the right people who will be able to transform our country. Everything being equal, Cameroon will be “an eldorado” in the next 20 years if such measures are implemented.

Mr Biya and co, please could you guys give room for meritocracy? Where are you driving our country to? There is the urgent need to stop this thing of appointing people as students in professional colleges who do not merit it.

Unfortunately too, this is merely another manifestation of the evils of our country; appointed MPs who do not even represent the will of the people but that of the political masters, appointed governors who ruled the people with colonial fists and who are there to rig elections with all impunity, and an appointed president who is there to serve neo-colonial interest and that of a few protégés in the country.

Agendia Aloysius

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Scandinavian countries want Mugabe’s resignation

Current situation aggravated by pride

Scandinavian countries including Iceland, Norway, Denmark, Finland and Sweden have added their voice to calls for the President of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe to resign.

In a statement released Friday, December 19, and endorsed by the Foreign Ministers of the said countries, and highly circulated in Nordic media outlets, the latter, accused Mugabe of being responsible for the current impasse and “grave humanitarian situation” in that country.

According to them, there is need to put “….an end to the misrule of Robert Mugabe and of the disrespect for democratic principles and human rights - which are core issues underlying the Nordic engagement and support for the liberation struggles in southern Africa,".

The Nordic countries reputed for their peaceful nature, believe the government of Zimbabwe is responsible for what they described as the “tragic situation in the country”

The call of these countries comes on the heels of that of the British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who initiated the move. President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, George Bush of USA, the Kenya Prime Minister, Raila Odinga, the President of Botswana and a handful of others have made semilar calls.

However, the South African Regional grouping, SADC, has called for restrain and dialogue. This position has also been supported by the African Union and Thabo Mbeki, former President of South Africa, appointed by SADC to mediate in the imbroglio which erupted after Tshangari bowed out of the second round elections on claims that his supporters were being attacked.

Meeting in Yaoundé, Cameroon recently, the Council for the Development of Social Research in Africa CODESRIA also criticised the use of any force as has been insinuated by some western countries.

While supporters of the embattled Zimbabwean opposition leader Morgan Tshangari, of the Movement for Democratic Change MDC, accused Mugabe of stalling the talks, supporters of Mugabe and some independent analysts have blamed Tshangari for constantly leaving the talks to consult his advisers who are said to be Britain and USA from whom Mugabe claims to be preventing a re-colonisation of his country.

In an interview with Abou Ammar, a Palestinian Masters Global Journalism student in the Orebro University Sweden, he described Mugabe as a hero who is painted evil by Western government and media. According to him, the west has dramatised the situation in Zimbabwe and are determined to crucify Muagbe. He regretted that Al Jazeera television which shows “good things” about Zimbabwe and Mugabe is not received in most homes in Africa.

Robert Ngu Ngomesia, a Master graduate in Computer Engineering says “the West are against Mugabe and not necessarily against the Zimbabwean people”. According to him, Mugabe should step down for the sake of the country. He however stresses “even though Mugabe is a strong fighter, let him think of his people now and step down.”

Robert holds that the sanctions on Zimbabwe have missed the target and “we are in a situation where neither Mugabe nor the West will want to be dragged in the mud” he says. While the West wants to maintain sanctions, Mugabe too wants to hang on and defy them. “The issue at stake now is pride” Roberts concludes.

Njang Joseph, a PhD student in USA describes Mugabe as a “bad guy like most African dictators” who should go but, he emphasizes that, for African countries to accept the use of any kind of force, will be the worst mistake ever, for any violence will spill to other countries in the region.

Mugabe, a long time friend with the West became an enemy when he began the redistribution to black Zimbabweans, of formerly exclusively white-owned farm land. The former had been deprived of most fertile land during the colonial era. The redistribution which was described as disorganised was speeded when Britain refused to continue funding it as had been agreed during the 1979 Lancaster House Agreement which paved the way for the independence of Zimbabwe in 1980, with Robert Mugabe as its pioneer president.

Mugabe says Zimbabwe is his and only the people of Zimbabwe will put him down. “Let Britain be for the British and Zimbabwe for Zimbabweans” he said during a rally of his ruling ZANU-PF party recently.

By Aloysius Agendia

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Is military intervention needed in Zimbabwe?

Is military intervention needed in Zimbabwe? What is presently doing the rounds in some news media and fora is the declared wish by some countries to wage war on Zimbabwe so as to “liberate” the people of that country from the pangs of what has been described as a dictatorial regime. Some are for, others against. Where are you? Meeting in Yaoundé, Cameroon on December 10, a group of African intellectuals attending the 12 congress of the Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa CODESRIA in very strong terms condemned any use of force in Zimbabwe. “.....We, the undersigned African scholars, are greatly concerned about threats of military intervention in Zimbabwe, ostensibly in the name of human rights and for humanitarian purposes.” They however, recognised the political impasse in the country but prefer diplomacy and appreciated the efforts of SADC because “…military intervention in Zimbabwe will militarise the whole of Southern Africa.” They cited DRC and Somalia as failed areas where force has been irrationally used with disastrous consequences. I may add Iraq. The document is signed by Professors Issa Shivji, Samir Amin, and 200 other scholars who attended the 12th Congress of CODESRIA, in Yaoundé Cameron. Who is who to tell a leader of another sovereign country that, time is up for him to leave power. The disaster in Iraq is there for us to see and draw conclusions. Those who have money to sponsor wars and who claim to be so concern about the health of Zimbabweans and other disadvantaged people world over, should have funded and facilitated the purchase and redistribution of the land in Zimbabwe which without mincing words, is the cause of the mayhem in that country today. I have never seen a situation where a group of countries or call them people, have been so united to punished someone they consider "recalcitrant" so as to give warning lesions to any other African leader who may want to “rebel” against the imposed “natural order”; imperialism and domination. Who are those funding the Tshangari(s), the rebels in Niger Delta, Nigeria, the Laurent Kunda(s), the Vincent Oti(s), who were those who funded the Savimbi(s) Jonas and paraded him as a liberator, the Foday Sankos, Samuel Doe, Les Forces Nouvelle in Cote D' Ivoire, who are those sowing confusion in Sudan, Chad, Central Africa Republic, who are those who killed Patrice Lumumba, Sankara, John Garang, Felix Moumie, Ernest Ouandie, Nnamdi Azikiwe.etc??? Who were those who coerced Ahidjo of Cameroon to resign and brought in Paul Biya who continues to serve neo colonial interest? These very people are setting confusion here and there, shipping weapons with "aide" and making us think they care when they do not really care at all. They know so well that a stable Africa will mean a diminished west. Unfortunately, these very people have successfully brainwashed a good number of African “educated elite" who now profess intellectual dishonesty just because they want something to eat. Robert Mugabe may have stayed too long but Morgan Tshangari is no better choice. To an extend, I buy the idea of the think tank who suggested that the better way might be to keep the two, Morgan and Mugabe away from power. But that is difficult still. They both love power. Tshangari‘s tactics have already proven that he cannot govern. He appears to be more of someone who is coming to auction the country back to the imperialists and the poverty creating and aggravating Bretton Woods institution for his personal survival and that of his accomplices. Another powerful wind of change, this time around, a real one needs to blow across Africa. But to achieve this, Africans need to sit up and make self critiques. I have never seen a dictator who organises elections and looses. African problems need African solutions. Inasmuch as we do not realise that, the situation will hardly ever change. Remove Jack and put Sam, in a few years we return to the same situation or even find ourselves in a worst situation. Very unfortunately too, the likes of young die hard African generation leaders like the Thomas Sankara(s), and the Lumumba(s) contrast with another generation like the Compoare(s), Odinga(s), Faure Eyadema(s), and the Joseph Kabila(s) etc. OMG, Safe this continent.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

Murder of Cameroonian girl reignites worries on trade in human parts

Murder of Cameroonian girl reignites worries on trade in human parts

Peace loving Cameroonians and Nigerians were again on November 10, 2008, taken aback with discovery of the gruesome murder of a Cameroonian lady, Ngeyi Xaverie Marie, allegedly by her concubine, a certain Nigerian born Chika Jude (See photo). The unfortunate girl was killed cold blooded and some of her body parts like eyes, private parts removed.

The macabre took place at Tamtam Weekend, a neighbourhood in Cameroon’s capital, Yaoundé. Their neighbours were said to have been alerted by a pungent odour from the lovers’ room and called the police who broke into the house to find Xaverie lying in her own pool of blood with body in an advanced state of decomposition. Chika was nowhere to be found.

Information from an eye witness, Prince Fotabong, from the deceased’s village, who assisted in the burial, indicate that Chika Jude had already called the family of the Xaverie to go to his Yaoundé residence and collect the remains of their daughter given that, he ( Chika Jude), was already at large. He used phone numbers (234) 708 915 5102 and (234) 703 399 8661, it is reported, indicating that he was already in Nigeria.

The killing of Xaverie brings again to question the issue of trafficking of human parts around the globe for medical and magical purposes.

In Cameroon, a few of such stories have always come up and unfortunately, the accused are often Nigerians. This does not in anyway mean that all Nigerians are as such. Years back, another Nigerian business man in Muyuka, a town in the South-western part of Cameroon, was said to have murdered his Cameroonian girl friend to extract parts of the body for rituals back home in Nigeria.

What are human parts being used for, and what actually prompts people to kill others to extract human parts?

While other says human parts have medical/scientific value, some believe human parts are used for magic and ritual purposes, such as getting more protection and money. Brain Handwerk, writing for National Geographic Ultimate Explorer on January 16, 2004 wrote “Organ Shortage Fuels Illicit Trade in Human Parts”

According to him, “In 2002, U.S. doctors performed 24,900 lifesaving organ transplants. But for every person lucky enough to receive a transplant, two others are added to a waiting list that now features more than 80,000 people in the U.S. alone. As desperation grows, so may an illicit trade in human organs in much of the developing world”. Is that then the reason for the killing of fellow humans to extract body parts? I do not think so.

In most countries in the world, like Cameroon and Nigeria, legislation clearly bans any sales of human organs. But according to Brain “….. With demand so high, many have attempted to profit by selling organs such as kidneys, obtained from living donors tempted to give up their "spare" organs for cash.

He further writes, “In December 2003, police in South Africa and in Brazil broke up an international ring trafficking in human kidneys. The racket also involved people in Israel—and possibly even further afield.” http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/01/0116_040116_EXPLorgantraffic.html

Another report culled from http://www.american.edu/TED/body.htm says Organs and other body parts do not necessarily have be donated or coerced from some unfortunate souls. They can be stolen.

It narrates cases in Germany where human body parts are smuggled out of hospital basements after each autopsy by some unscrupulous hospital workers and sold to local drug companies for the extraction of growth hormones. The list of items on Drug Company’s plan does not stop there.

The same online report states that ".....in an investigative report by Der Spiegel, a liberal German newsmagazine, drug companies also buy meninges --the membranes that surround the brain and spinal cord -- by tens of thousands. They are used to make a valuable medication used in skin transplants. Recently, pathologists in one city began extracting muscle membranes from corpses thighs, which is then sold to firms that market reconstructive surgery. Lastly, brains and other organs are shipped to medical schools to be used by students in anatomy classes".

The report concludes that that “The loser in all this, human market, is undoubtedly the dead people and their loved ones who do not realize that with or without the permission for autopsy, the parts of the deceased are being plundered”

That is not the case in many parts of the world, for, living human are also being killed and body part removed. Others are forced to sell to some of their body parts.

Some traditional doctors and soothsayers have in some cases asked their desperate clients to bring human parts. This is often in a bid to scare away such clients but, the some of among the latter do go and kill to retrieve human parts.

In an article published in Ocnus.net on May 3, 2007 it is reported that the US had even accused China of coercing prisoners to donate their organs for transplants. .

It further reiterates “In some parts of Nigeria human parts are used for magical rites and other rituals. These parts, too, are stolen by debauched, profit-seeking individuals, and later sold to witchdoctors or pastors who perform various kinds of rites. http://www.ocnus.net/artman/publish/article_28828.shtml

According to it, in Nigeria, body parts are sold and bought mostly for fetish and magical reasons. It equally asserted that most of the horrible deals are done in the Western and Eastern parts of Nigeria.

In neighbouring Cameroon, former BBC reporter, Ange NGU Thomas on April 3, 2003 reported the arrest by police in Douala, Cameroon’s economic capital of two men in possession of a bag full of human bones.

According to the report the two men told the police that the human bones were ordered by an unnamed Cameroonian professional footballer.

Barrister Chief Charles Taku (Fuatabong Achaleke) an advocate at the International War Crimes Tribunal in Arusha Tanzania says the Cameroon penal code seriously punishes trafficking in human parts. He posits that international law equally has more of general provisions in international human rights law, which prohibits cruel and degrading treatment, human trafficking and also specific previsions in bilateral and treaty law. He also advocates for the need for moral reawakening.

There is the urgent need for fellow humans stop behaving like cannibals and have respect for life.

Monday, December 1, 2008

Development Communication as a panacea to world’s major problems

Development Communication as a panacea/solution to world’s major problems The world is more than ever before faced with the growing challenges such as poverty alleviation, improvement in health conditions, education, political and women empowerment, climate change, terrorism, immigration among others। In a bid to resolving these problems, one of the most important aspects, that is, development communication is not being implemented or it is being done artificially. Development communication means dialogue, involving people, it is understanding etc. We cannot dialogue with each other when we do not want to involve them or when we do not want to even see them at all. We cannot effectively carry out development communication when our hidden agenda is to exploit others. The world today, be it in the private or public sector, needs leaders, managers, and people well drilled in development communication and who will practice it effectively and efficiently. This is not about sitting in offices and giving orders or signing repressive decrees that do not only affect our people negatively but, which go beyond our national and territorial boundaries. Arabs and Christians, the West and the Moslem world, developed and developing countries, opposition and ruling parties need to go in for meaningful dialogue. These groups also need to dialogue and involve each other in their various setups. All these, for the sake of meaningful sustainable development. Development communication is not only about information sharing and mutual understanding but, also, going in for collective action. It implies that the stakeholders in the process of development who include; local leaders, the people targeted in a given project, as well as those coordinating just to mention a few, are expected to sit down and discuss on how they will go about a given program. In the process of dialogue, misunderstandings are reduced and disagreements, minimized. With the growing need for development in the field of health, education, poverty alleviation, women empowerment etc, several national and international Non governmental organizations, local governments and other institutions are on the ground to achieve the millennium development goals. Participatory development communication istherefore extremely important but, is not only limited at the level of NGOs, but also, extended to government and local beneficiaries. Is the Bretton Woods failing? Even the Breton Woods institutions, major proponents of development communication are wanting, in effectively implementing participatory development communication. Most of its clients, impoverish countries in the developing world, remain receivers of instructions instead of people participating in dialogue, understanding and effective development communication that can bring about an improvement in the living conditions of people. The IMF and World Bank merely give instructions among which has been the privatization without calculation on the impact of such measures on people. Many of their programs have failed woefully like the Structural Adjustment programs because of ineffective development communication strategies. The Prime Minister of Cameroon, Thomas Ephraim Inoni, in a newspaper report on November 19, 2008 attributed Cameroon’s slow economic development as partly due to stringent and unrealistic IMF policies. "It is now evident that government had become fed-up with the IMF imposed conditionality to accordingly bail the country from its long economic crunch” Eden newspaper wrote. He “acknowledged that development in the country under Biya had been slow but blamed this on what he described as IMF constraints" while presenting 2009 draft budget of his country in parliament. ."http://www.edennewspaper.com/content/view/3649/1/ This may be a complain from a lazy government but does not cancel the fact that they may still have a point. In most cases, the Bretton Woods institutions meet with leaders of various countries while ignoring the civil society. The United Nations too? Even the United Nations is not different. We cannot practice or talk about participatory development communication when a few are in the Security Council, some with what is called veto power, almost block the survival of other states. In development communication, no party can successfully succeed when others reign as kings' not ready to listen but to give orders." As Agunga (1997) notes, Communication should be geared towards creating and stimulating understanding as a basis of development rather than merely transmitting information. " I consider US President-elect, Barack Obama’s plan to meet with leaders of some countries considered as "sponsors" of terrorism like Iran, a positive approach toward development communication. Instead of sitting in offices with stereotypes and considering people as terrorists, dictators whereas they may be freedom fighters, it is important to meet dialogue with them and know what people want. What is rather evident is that capitalism hates any form of dialogue or development communication that will benefit the other party other than itself. It seeks for exploitation and survival of the fittest, which is terrible. As my conclusion, get the people involved; use the right strategies and the right people (professionals) to pilot development communication in all our institutions and in every project. How often do elected officials especially in developing countries go back to their electorates to explain certain issues and get their views? ?????" Aloysius Agendia